Providers of hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” equipment
and services are eyeing the Chinese market to expand their offerings—and the Obama
Administration initially will cough up $378,000 so the industry can travel to
China to further examine such potential opportunities.
The U.S. Trade & Development Agency (USTDA), an
independent White House agency, is providing the grant for what it calls the U.S.-China
Shale Gas Training Program, which will “help introduce Chinese energy sector
officials and project sponsors to U.S. shale gas best practices, policies and
technologies.”
USTDA last month had signed a Memorandum of Understanding
with China’s National Energy Administration (NEA) for this program, according
to a solicitation that U.S. Trade & Aid Monitor located via routine
database research. The initiative’s Statement of Work (SOW) says:
This project was requested during the 2012 U.S.-China Oil
and Gas Forum and supports the U.S. China Shale Gas Resource Initiative led by
the U.S. State Department, as well as the work associated with the U.S.-China
Oil and Gas Forum led by the U.S. Department of Energy.
The endeavor will center on the provision four two-day technical
workshops that a USTDA contractor will hold in China over a twenty month period.
The agency anticipates hosting 50-75 Chinese participants hand-picked by the
China NEA “in cooperation with USTDA.”
These participants largely will “come from Chinese
government entities and the Chinese firms that have been awarded blocs for
shale gas…” the SOW says.
The program’s stated goal is to “optimize the potential
for U.S. exports, pointing out that “In less than a generation, the United
States has soared to world leadership in extracting natural gas from shale
formations through hydraulic fracturing.”
U.S. companies, it continues:
view the current development of shale gas
in China as an opportune time to engage this largely untapped market. The
Chinese government and its oil and gas companies are also looking to the United
States for guidance as they recognize many hurdles exist before the shale gas
industry can reach full commercialization.
Considering that U.S. companies already hold that
position of world leadership in that industry segment, the document left unclear
why U.S. taxpayers will fund its further expansion.
USTDA already is setting its sights on funneling even
more cash from the U.S Treasury to this successful industry sector, which is
led by multinational corporations such as Halliburton Corp. and Schlumberger
Ltd.
Indeed, the SOW makes clear that this Chinese “training
program,” as the agency calls it, “is also expected to be an effective business
development tool” for an upcoming USTDA-funded feasibility study as well as
other “technical assistance activities in the shale gas sector.”
Source document: Solicitation #RFP-CO201361047.
FOR MORE COVERAGE OF THE U.S TRADE & DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, VISIT THE MONITOR'S USTDA PAGE.
FOR ADDITIONAL REGIONAL COVERAGE, VISIT THE MONITOR'S CHINA PAGE.
ALSO SEE THE MONITOR'S ENERGY PAGE.
Hurricane Sandy: Another Example of Why We Need to Invest More in America, Less Around the Globe (COMMENTARY)
I have an idea how we as a nation can better cope with the financial burden that nature has imposed upon us in this post-hurricane environment of devastation on the East Coast: Assess and then cancel various programs that U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Agency for International Development, and the U.S. Trade & Development Agency currently are carrying out or are planning to implement across the globe.
For the sake of full disclosure, I say this not only as a concerned taxpayer who continues to advocate streamlining (not the elimination) of foreign aid, but as a human being who lives one mile from the beach on the battered New Jersey coast -- someone who is doing significantly better than many of his Shore neighbors, but who is temporarily displaced nonetheless.
Before I continue, also keep in mind that this is less political -- insofar as partisan politics -- than it appears. Yes, the Obama Administration currently is executing the following initiatives. But as I've said before, it's a power thing, not an Obama thing. Such endeavors took place under Clinton and Bush, and in various forms will continue under future presidents.
Here we go:
Cancel the planned development of Ph.D. and masters degree programs for which USAID intends to fund in a Ugandan university. Use that money in schools across New Jersey, New York, or Connecticut.
Cancel the nearly $1 billion in construction projects that USAID has planned for the Palestinians. Use it to rebuild homes, businesses, and infrastucture destroyed during the hurricane. OUR hurricane.
Those business start-up projects in The Philippines? Cancel them. Most of the businesses in my area are closed, hopefully just temporarily. many, presumbaly, will go under. Tell the Filipinos they have to wait.
The groundwater cleanup projects in for which USTDA paid the cost of U.S. industry reps to fly to China to boost that sector? Stop such subsidies, damnit. I'm guessing the groundwater between Seaside Heights and Point Pleasant (among other locations) could use some ameliorating.
The list is seemningly endless. There are bigger and even more controversial projects, I am sure, the billions is no so-called "drug war" contracts among one of the more insane categories.
Oh, okay, just one more example (out of many). I know it amounts to peanuts, but the $322,000 that Department of State just spent on a 10-animal dog kennel in Iraq could have been used to rebuild damaged animal -- and human -- shelters here on the East Coast instead. Just sayin.' -- Steve Peacock